Showing posts with label race. Show all posts
Showing posts with label race. Show all posts

Sunday, August 14, 2016

Obama Signs Bill Removing ‘Oriental’ and ‘Negro’ From Federal Laws

Now, only if we could do this to our school textbooks and university curriculae theories.

Thank you, U.S. Representative Grace Meng.


Congresswoman  Grace Meng
The words “Oriental” and “Negro” will no longer be part of federal law.
President Barack Obama signed a bill Friday eliminating the offensive and outdated descriptors, after the legislation passed unanimously in the House and Senate earlier this month.
Rep. Grace Meng (D-N.Y.) sponsored the bill, which aimed to “modernize“ two references to “Orientals” and “Negros” in the U.S. Code that date to the 1970’s. The words will be replaced with “Asian Americans” and “African Americans,” respectively. 
“The term ‘Oriental’ has no place in federal law and at long last this insulting and outdated term will be gone for good,” Meng said in a statement on Friday. 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/oriental-negro-federal-law_us_574332d4e4b0613b512adf37


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, May 16, 2016

CONYERS, Scott to Unveil New GAO Report on Segregation in Public Schools

TOMORROW: CONYERS, SCOTT TO UNVEIL NEW GAO REPORT ON SEGREGATION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS

**For an embargoed copy of the report, email Shadawn.reddick-smith@mail.house.gov . All materials related to this report are embargoed until 1:30 p.m./EDT on Tuesday, May 17, 2016.**

Washington, D.C. – On Tuesday, May 17th at 1:30PM, Committee on the Judiciary Ranking Member John Conyers, Jr. (MI-13) and Committee on Education and the Workforce Ranking Member Bobby Scott (VA-03) will host a press conference to unveil the findings of a new report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) on actions needed to reduce racial and socioeconomic segregation, and address disparities in K-12 public schools. Ranking Members Conyers and Scott along with retired Congressman and former Ranking Member George Miller, first requested this report in May 2014.

Dean of the U.S. House
of Representatives
John Conyers, Jr.
Sixty-two years ago, the Supreme Court struck down lawful school segregation in the Brown v. Board of Education decision, stating that education was “perhaps the most important function of state and local government.” The decision also affirmed that education was a right that “must be made available to all on equal terms.” GAO gathered data for this report from the Department of Education and confirmed that race and poverty continue to be a driver for inequities in education, and that housing segregation patterns contribute to school segregation.

WHO:  Ranking Member John Conyers, Jr. (MI-13), Committee on the Judiciary; Ranking Member Robert C. “Bobby” Scott (VA-03), Committee on Education and the Workforce; Representative G.K. Butterfield (NC-01), Chair, Congressional Black Caucus; Marc Morial, President and CEO, National Urban League; Nancy Zirkin, Executive Vice President, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
                                                                                                            
WHAT:  Press conference releasing new GAO report on actions needed to reduce racial and socioeconomic segregation, and address disparities in public schools.
                       
                        WHEN:  Tuesday, May 17, 2016, 1:30 – 2:15 p.m.

WHERE:  421 Cannon House Office Building (CHOB), Washington, DC

RSVP:      Media interested in attending Tuesday’s press conference should RSVP toShadawn.Reddick-Smith@mail.house.gov.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Monday, January 19, 2015

John Conyers, who first proposed an MLK holiday, marks 50 years in Congress

John Conyers, who first proposed an MLK holiday, marks 50 years in Congress


Four days after the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., a junior member of Congress introduced a bill to establish a federal holiday to honor the slain civil rights leader.
Five decades later, the holiday is on the calendar, and that lawmaker, Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), is now the longest-serving member of Congress.
Monday presents a unique bit of historical symmetry for Conyers, who marked 50 years in Congress this month. Both his longevity and the holiday are testaments and byproducts of the civil rights struggles led by King. For the first time, the 85-year-old will observe the Martin Luther King Jr. Day holiday as dean of the House, the ceremonial title for the longest-serving member of the House of Representatives.
“To me, [King] is the outstanding international leader of the 20th century without ever holding office. What he did — I doubt anyone else could have done,” he said.
An Army veteran and lawyer by training, Conyers worked with King and other civil rights activists in the South before coming to Congress. While many Americans are filling theaters to see the Oscar-nominated movie “Selma,” Conyers can recall his own visits to the Alabama town in the months preceding the infamous “Bloody Sunday” march.
After a series of deadly police confrontations that left black men dead in Missouri and New York, a new generation of Americans is mobilizing around concerns about issues of law and justice. Conyers said these new battles mirror the struggles that propelled him into public life.
Issues of justice and equality remain top-of-mind for Conyers, one of the founders of the Congressional Black Caucus and the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee.
“We’ve always had a very tense relationship between the African-American community and police, law enforcement, particularly young African American males,” he said.
“The one thing I notice is that there’s more attention being focused on racial police incidents, the use of police force than ever before,” he added. “It isn’t that these kinds of events weren’t happening before.”
The deaths of Michael Brown, who was killed by a Ferguson, Mo., police officer, and Eric Garner, who died after being placed in a chokehold by a New York police officer, have compelled Republicans to engage on an issue they rarely discuss publicly. Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) said late last year that he expected his caucus to continue exploring “unanswered questions” in the wake of the two men’s deaths.
“I do think that the American people deserve more answers about what really happened here and was our system of justice handled properly,” he said at the time.
Conyers said that Boehner’s remarks contrast sharply with the Congress he joined in 1965. Then, he was one of only five African Americans in office. Now, there are 48.
“We’ve gone from where there was flat-out segregation and there was a fairly sizable school of members of Congress who believed in segregation and did not see it as a constitutional or legal problem in any respect. Now that doesn’t exist anymore,” he said.
But he’s disturbed by how other Republicans talk about race. He’s not surprised by the news that House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) once spoke to a white supremacist group while serving in the Louisiana legislature. Scalise apologized and has distanced himself from the group, and other GOP leaders are eager to move on.
“I don’t know who the group was, I don’t know what he said, but this complete denial and almost cover-up of that is not very encouraging,” Conyers said.
Conyers wants Congress to have a candid conversation about race but says he can find few Republicans willing to engage him.
“Considering the political circumstances that the Republican majority find themselves in, I think they’re less than eager to want to get into this,” he added. “But I think like everything else, it’s sort of inevitable. You can’t get away from some of the questions that are being raised and the discussion going on.”
Conyers and House Democrats plan to spend this year drawing attention to ongoing concerns with voting rights after the Supreme Court invalidated parts of the Voting Rights Act in 2013. The court struck down sections of the law dealing with the special scrutiny imposed on states with a history of discrimination, compelling Congress to come up with a new formula based on current data to determine which states should be subject to the law.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) said last week that he sees no need to revamp the law — yet another sign of disagreement between Republicans and Democrats.
“We have not seen a process forward that is necessary to protect people because we think the Voting Rights Act is providing substantial protection in this area right now,” Goodlatte said at a breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor.
Conyers is undeterred.
“The Supreme Court kind of threw us a curveball on that, but look, that’s happened before,” he said. The court’s decision makes voting rights “a new, big issue,” he said. But, he said, people should be mindful that things have been much worse.
A petition dispute nearly kept Conyers off the ballot last year, but he prevailed in court and earned nearly 80 percent of the vote on Election Day. Despite younger challengers eager for the seat and his advancing age, he’s preparing to run again in 2016.
“The reason I think I’m going to run again is that I’ve never thought about stepping aside,” he said. “I still enjoy my work. There’s still plenty of challenges, new ones arising.”
He’s especially worried about the nation’s growing dependency on technology.
“In this age of cybertechnology, of computerization, of drones, the ability to commit ourselves to national, local, international military activity is much easier now than it used to be,” he said. “Unless we’re dealing with that, there’s no way we can make the nation and the nations of the worlds, the peoples on the planet safer. We have this super-technology that’s making it easier to commit violence.”
Conyers is one of seven men — all of them Democrats — to serve in Congress at least 50 years, and he relishes the irony in succeeding his former boss, former congressman John D. Dingell (D-Mich.), as the chamber’s longest-serving member. Conyers was once a Dingell staffer, and their fathers were close.
Dingell was the last member of Congress elected in the 1950s. Conyers is the last current member of Congress to have been elected in the 1960s. His next-nearest colleague is Rep. Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.), who came to Congress in 1971.
Conyers introduced the bill proposing the King holiday on April 8, 1968 — four days after King was killed. Ronald Reagan didn’t sign the law making it a federal holiday until 1983.
Many Americans use the three-day weekend for ski trips or beach vacations, and many businesses discreetly mark down prices to draw in shoppers. Conyers will celebrate at a series of events in his district. He’s heartened that the holiday is so widely observed.
“King is still studied, honored, remembered, and the holiday is still meaningful,” he said. “It is not just another day that you have to go to work.”
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, December 20, 2014

John Conyers Jr.: How Congress can address our racial outrage

By John Conyers, Jr.

John Conyers, Jr.
Nearly 50 years ago, the Kerner Commission, which was created in the aftermath of the country’s 1967 riots, warned that “our nation is moving toward two societies, one black, one white — separate and unequal.” And now, six years after the election of our first African American president, we still find ourselves riven by racial distrust and fear. The string of deaths of unarmed blacks by police officers in Cleveland, Phoenix, New York and Ferguson, Mo., challenge not only the strength of our criminal and social justice systems but also the credibility and legitimacy of our political system.

In 1965, when I came to Congress, I joined a legislative body that was still able to work together at times of national crisis. The first major bill I voted on, the Voting Rights Act, was a response to widespread outrage over the police reaction to the “Bloody Sunday” protests, including the beatings in Selma, Ala. Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield (D-Mont.) and his Republican counterpart, Everett Dirksen (Ill.), introduced the bill, and the final legislation enjoyed more support from Republican than Democratic members, an almost unthinkable dynamic today.

Even after the divisive impact of the so-called “Gingrich Revolution” when Congress was truly tested, we were able to rise to the occasion. In 1996, in the midst of a wave of arsons targeting African American houses of worship, then-Judiciary Chairman Henry Hyde, a stalwart Republican from Illinois, asked me to work with him on a legislative response. We disagreed on most of the major social issues of the day, from abortion to affirmative action. However, during this crisis we found a way to introduce and pass the Church Arson Prevention Act, which not only gave law enforcement needed prosecutorial tools but also sent a loud and clear signal to the minority community that Congress was willing and able to act.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, August 15, 2014

REP. CONYERS STATEMENT ON TRAGIC EVENTS IN FERGUSON, MISSOURI



DETROIT – U.S. Congressman John Conyers Jr. (MI-13) released the following statement in response to ongoing events in Ferguson, Missouri:

“A few facts are clear: A young, unarmed man was shot by a police officer. A small town is under what is essentially martial law. Tear gas and rubber bullets are being used against everyday citizens. Serious and sweeping civil rights violations may have taken place in Ferguson, Missouri.  

The tragic killing of 18-year-old Michael Brown and the events that have transpired since the shooting in Ferguson are reminiscent of the violent altercations that took place during the Civil Rights Movement. Countless African Americans endured unwarranted hostility and excessive force from law enforcement while exercising their right to peaceful assembly and civil resistance.

It is a great travesty to find ourselves again witnessing the blatant violation of our right to peaceably assemble in Ferguson.  As documented by journalists and people on the ground in Ferguson over the last week, state and local law enforcement have grossly mismanaged any attempts to peaceably resolve the situation. Earlier this week, my colleagues and I issued a letter to the Department of Justice asking them to consider expanding the scope of federal involvement and to investigate the legal and civil rights ramifications of the shooting and surrounding circumstances. 

Removal of the St. Louis County Police Department from any involvement in the policing of Ferguson is an important step towards restoring peace and allowing for an independent, thorough investigation to take place. The people of Ferguson deserve nothing less.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, May 30, 2014

Ranking Member Conyers Statement at Overcriminalization Task Force Hearing


(WASHINGTON) – This morning, the U.S. House Judiciary Committee Overcriminalization Task Force held a hearing on penalties. During his opening remarks, Ranking Member John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.) delivered the following statement:

U.S. Representative
John Conyers
“The Over-Criminalization Task Force finally focuses today on what is the most critical failing of our Nation’s criminal justice system: the continuing prevalence of racism as evidenced by a federal charging and sentencing regime that clearly discriminates against people of color. Racism has permeated our nation’s history since the beginning. The Constitution referred to slaves as three-fifths of a man. The Civil War was fought to abolish slavery, and then Jim Crow raised his ugly head. We are fast approaching the sixtieth anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education, which struck down ‘separate but equal’ as the law of the land. And just last year, we celebrated the fiftieth anniversary of the March on Washington, and the passage of the Civil Rights Act.

“As a nation, we have come so far.  We like to now think that justice is colorblind; that the system is race neutral.  But, whether overt or subconscious, the vestiges of racism are still reflected in our federal criminal justice system, and it is all the more insidious for it.  That is because criminal justice is meted out by human beings with real human failings, including bias. No longer does Jim Crow and overt racism rule the day, but rather coded phrases such as ‘policing high crime areas’ and ‘stop and frisk’ policies are the norm.  And combined with mandatory minimums, stacking and enhancement penalties, and so-called ‘three strikes’ statutes, it is these concepts that disproportionately affect communities of color, drawing more and more people into an antagonistic and unforgiving criminal justice system.

“To provide some perspective regarding this problem, let’s begin with a few facts:In the last 40 years, the U.S. prison population has grown by 700%, and now accounts for 25% of the world’s prisoners.  The number of federal prisoners alone grew by nearly 50% from 2001 to 2010.

While only 4% of federal crimes carry mandatory minimum sentences, 34% of those in federal prison are serving mandatory sentences.

Moreover, the racial impact of the federal penalty system is wildly disproportionate:

Ø  1-in-9 black men between ages 20 and 34 are incarcerated.
Ø  1-in-3 black men, and 1-in-6 Latinos will spend some part of their lives in prison, compared to 1-in-23 white men.
Ø  Blacks represent 12% of total drug users in the country, but account for nearly 40% of drug related arrests.

“These numbers are far worse in segregated and impoverished communities. In addition to the devastating societal cost of mass incarceration, it also results in a massive economic cost.  The so-called ‘war on drugs’ has cost $1 trillion since its beginning, and the cost to run our federal prisons cost $6.9 billion in FY 2014.

“Before we identify solutions, we must recognize how we institutionalize and normalize racism today. First, I want to focus on how racism, unconscious or not, has a disproportionate impact on criminal penalties on minority communities.  Bias can begin with the decision of where and what offenses are investigated.  With enough time and officers in a certain location, it is only a matter of time before they find ‘reasonable suspicion’ to stop, detain, and arrest someone.

“At the prosecutorial phase, this bias can be magnified through decisions about what charges to bring, what plea deal to offer, and whether mandatory minimums and enhancements apply.  People from poor communities of color are more likely to receive harsher charges and mandatory penalties.

“The mandatory minimums and statutory enhancements so ingrained in the Code that were intended to target so-called ‘kingpins’ and violent criminals do no such thing.  Their use is now propagated against low-level, non-violent offenders who are disproportionately poor people of color. The threat of these staggering mandatory de facto life sentences coerces defendants into pleading guilty.  They impose a trial penalty on those who their constitutional right to a jury trial.

“Finally, at sentencing, people of color receive harsher sentences than would whites for the same conduct through mandatory minimums and other sentencing enhancements. Racism in American has, for the most part, ceased to be overt, but the prevalence of institutionalizing discrimination by writing it into law is just as present today as it was 100 years ago.

“The question that stands is: What can we, as a Congress, do about these pressing issues? Finding solutions to unconsciously institutionalized racism in the criminal justice system, and writ large on society, is not an easy task.  But there are steps we can take. We can begin by rolling back mandatory minimums and stacking and enhancement sentencing penalties that result in cruel and unusual punishment for what are too often low-level offenses. We can revest the federal judiciary with discretion in sentencing.  Not all judges are immune to bias, but in doing so we allow for the possibility of proportional sentencing, and the ability to overturn unduly harsh sentences due to abuse of discretion. We can recognize that Congress can and should defer to States in matters that the States can – and already do – investigate, prosecute and sentence, rather than engage in wasteful duplicative federal prosecutions allowing United States Attorneys to focus on uniquely federal concerns.

“Criminal justice is just one symptom of the underlying problem, and I hope to work with my colleagues in the future to hold a more in-depth forum to explore the issues of systemic racism and its impacts on society at large that will include a look at education, public services, voting rights, drug and mental health treatment, and employment. For today, I am hopeful that our witnesses today can shed light on the issues of the disparate racial impact of the criminal justice system, the economic and societal impact of these policies, and propose potential solutions and I look forward to their testimony.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Sunday, April 22, 2012

25 Years After McCleskey, Looking Forward to Legislative Fixes of Supreme Court Error


25 Years After McCleskey, Looking Forward to Legislative Fixes of Supreme Court Error


On the federal level, since the McCleskey decision, members of Congress have proposed numerous laws – 15 so far – addressing racial justice in the federal capital punishment system. As part of the omnibus crime bill passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton in 1994, Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI) proposed an amendment called the Racial Justice Act, after which the North Carolina law is modeled, to be included in the legislation as a congressional response to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in McCleskey. The Justice Integrity Act, introduced in 2009, sought to address racial and ethnic disparities across the criminal justice system by proposing pilot programs in 10 jurisdictions that would include collection of data concerning investigations and prosecutions and recommendations for reform. Those reforms didn't pass, but Friday's ruling in North Carolina reminds us that the nation can no longer ignore the fact of racial bias in the death penalty system, and that lawmakers must do more to fix it.


Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

At Senate Judiciary Panel Conyers Calls on Congress to Pass End Racial Profiling Act



(WASHINGTON) – Today, House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.) testified  before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights at a hearing entitled “Ending Racial Profiling in America.”  He spoke to the need for Congress to enact his legislation to end racial profiling by law enforcement and the importance of community based policing as means to not only stop crime but to also protect citizens’ civil rights.  Ranking Member Conyers is the lead House cosponsor of H.R. 3618, the “End Racial Profiling Act.”   

U.S. Representative John Conyers, Jr. testifying before
U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee on
End Racial Profiling Act
“The majority of public safety officials perform their duties with professionalism and bravery,” said Conyers after the hearing.  “However racial profiling still does occur, undermining the trust between communities and law enforcement officials necessary for effective, proven community policing.  That is why Congress needs to prohibit racial profiling by enacting the ‘End Racial Profiling Act.’  Singling out individuals for additional scrutiny based on race should be illegal because it is ineffective at preventing crime, a violation of citizens’ civil rights, and morally wrong.”      

First introduced in the House of Representatives by Ranking Member Conyers in 2001,  the “End Racial Profiling Act” would prohibit local and federal law enforcement agencies from singling out individuals based on race and provide further training to law enforcement officials in order eliminate racial profiling.  Ranking Member Conyers and Senator Ben Cardin (D-Md.) reintroduced the “End Racial Profiling Act” in both the House and the Senate this Congress as H.R. 3618 and S. 1670 respectively.



End Racial Profiling Act U.S. Senate Bill 1670 of 2012

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Racial Profiling Victims Join Members Of Congress To Call For Federal Action To Ban Racial Profiling

Racial Profiling Victims Join Members Of Congress To Call For Federal Action To Ban Racial Profiling


Tomorrow, April 17, 2012 victims of racial profiling will be joined by members of Congress and national advocates at a press conference urging the Senate to pass the End Racial Profiling Act (ERPA). The press conference, which will take place in a Senate office building, immediately follows a Senate hearing  on the bill, the first hearing of its kind since 9/11.

The Trayvon Martin case, along with recently passed state anti-immigrant laws and increased surveillance of Muslim and South Asian communities, has reignited the charge to prohibit racial profiling in America. Not only is the practice ineffective, it allows law enforcement to rely on stereotypes when making critical decisions about individuals’ freedoms.

Speakers will advocate for the passage of the End Racial Profiling Act and for reform of the Department of Justice Guidance Regarding the Use of Race by Federal Law Enforcement agencies to eliminate loopholes for national security, border security while prohibiting profiling based on national origin and religion. The following day, a number of press conference speakers will meet with congressional representatives, senators and their staffs about the need for federal action to ban racial profiling.

What: Press conference featuring victims of racial profiling immediately following the Senate hearing on racial profiling and the End Racial Profiling Act.

Who: Sen. Dick Durbin, (D-Illinois) Chairman of Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights, a co-sponsor of ERPA who spearheaded a dear colleague letter effort to revise the U.S. Department of Justice’s racial profiling guidance.

Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Maryland), Senate sponsor of the End Racial Profiling Act.
Margaret Huang, Executive Director, Rights Working Group

Rep. John Conyers (D-Michigan), Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee and House sponsor of the End Racial Profiling Act will discuss the need for this legislation.

Bonita Rhodes-Berg, an African-American mother and grandmother who settled a civil rights lawsuit involving the Drug Enforcement Administration after she was racially profiled.
Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minnesota), House cosponsor of the End Racial Profiling Act.

Tiburcio Briceno, a U.S. citizen of Mexican origin who was stopped by Michigan State Police for an alleged traffic violation and handcuffed to await the arrival of Customs Border Patrol despite his protests that he was a citizen.

Rep. Judy Chu (D-California), House cosponsor of End Racial Profiling Act and chair of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus.

Elizabeth Dann, a third-year law student at New York University recently learned that the New York Police Department had placed the Muslim Student Association she belongs to, like others in the Northeast, under surveillance based on the students’ religious beliefs.

Rep. Luis Gutierrez, (D-Illinois), House cosponsor of End Racial Profiling Act. (invited)

Anthony Romero, Executive Director, American Civil Liberties Union.

Hilary O. Shelton, Director, NAACP Washington Bureau & Senior Vice President of Advocacy and Policy.
Rev. Jamal Bryant , Pastor, Empowerment Temple AME Church of Baltimore, youth activist,
and advisor to the Trayvon Martin Family.

Kevin Lavine, a retired police officer and criminal justice professor.

When: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 (Approx 11:45 a.m. Begins immediately after hearing.)

Where: Dirksen Senate Office Building, Room 226, Constitution Ave. and 1st Street NE.

Contacts: Keith Rushing, Communications Manager, Rights Working Group, 202.591.3305 (o), 202.557.4291 (c), krushing@rightsworkinggroup.org mailto:krushing@rightsworkinggroup.org
Scott Westbrook Simpson, Press Secretary, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, 202.466.2061 (o) simpson@civilrights.org mailto:simpson@civilrights.org 

Sandhya Bathija, Media Relations Associate, The American Civil Liberties Union, 202.715.0833 (o), 202.568.0079 (c), sbathija@dcaclu.org mailto:sbathija@dcaclu.org 

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, November 4, 2011

Racial Profiling Undermines Public Safety

For Immediate Release
Date: Friday, November 4, 2011
Contact: Matthew Morgan – 202-226-5543

Racial Profiling Undermines Public Safety
Targeting based on race poor substitute for good police work and Illegal

(WASHINGTON) – Today, the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security held a hearing on “21stCentury Law Enforcement: How Smart Policing Targets Criminal Behavior.”  The hearing focused on racial profiling and its supposed effectiveness as a legitimate law enforcement tactic.  The subcommittee heard testimony from the following witnesses:

·         Mr. Hilary O. Shelton, Director, NAACP Washington Bureau
·         Ms. Heather Mac Donald, Senior Fellow, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research
·         Mr. Edward Conlon, Former NYPD Detective
·         Mr. David A. Harris, Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh Law
·         Mr. Jiles H. Ship, National President, National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives

In response to their testimony at today’s hearing , House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.) made the following statement:

“Racial profiling is a poor substitute for smart policing,” said Conyers.  “The basis of effective policing is the promotion of  a positive relationship between law enforcement officials and the communities they aim to protect.  But the specter of racial profiling has contaminated the relationship between the police and minority communities to such a degree that more than 25 states have enacted legislation to address the issue of racial profiling.  If law enforcement is to do its job effectively, officers at all levels of government should be trained to focus on suspect behavior, not a person’s race, in order to better catch criminals and protect communities.    

“Since I first introduced data collection legislation in 1997, I have been engaged in an effort to get to the bottom of racial profiling issues. In response to these concerns, the Department of Justice under the past two presidents and members of Congress have introduced a variety of measures designed to sanction the practice.  Last session, I introduced the End Racial Profiling Act and plan to reintroduce that legislation later this month.  We must put in place a data collection requirement for police stops nationwide.   

“Congress must reaffirm the concept that when law-abiding citizens are treated differently by those who enforce the law simply because of their race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin, they are denied the basic respect and equal treatment that is the right of every American.”   
   
###

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©