Showing posts with label profiling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label profiling. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

At Senate Judiciary Panel Conyers Calls on Congress to Pass End Racial Profiling Act



(WASHINGTON) – Today, House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.) testified  before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights at a hearing entitled “Ending Racial Profiling in America.”  He spoke to the need for Congress to enact his legislation to end racial profiling by law enforcement and the importance of community based policing as means to not only stop crime but to also protect citizens’ civil rights.  Ranking Member Conyers is the lead House cosponsor of H.R. 3618, the “End Racial Profiling Act.”   

U.S. Representative John Conyers, Jr. testifying before
U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee on
End Racial Profiling Act
“The majority of public safety officials perform their duties with professionalism and bravery,” said Conyers after the hearing.  “However racial profiling still does occur, undermining the trust between communities and law enforcement officials necessary for effective, proven community policing.  That is why Congress needs to prohibit racial profiling by enacting the ‘End Racial Profiling Act.’  Singling out individuals for additional scrutiny based on race should be illegal because it is ineffective at preventing crime, a violation of citizens’ civil rights, and morally wrong.”      

First introduced in the House of Representatives by Ranking Member Conyers in 2001,  the “End Racial Profiling Act” would prohibit local and federal law enforcement agencies from singling out individuals based on race and provide further training to law enforcement officials in order eliminate racial profiling.  Ranking Member Conyers and Senator Ben Cardin (D-Md.) reintroduced the “End Racial Profiling Act” in both the House and the Senate this Congress as H.R. 3618 and S. 1670 respectively.



End Racial Profiling Act U.S. Senate Bill 1670 of 2012

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, November 18, 2011

Editorial: Continuing abuses by immigration authorities belie promise of more humane treatment

Editorial: Continuing abuses by immigration authorities belie promise of more humane treatment


Alan Bersin, national commander of the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection.


Despite some encouraging signals on immigration reform from the White House, widespread human rights abuses continue on both the northern and southern borders.

Immigration reform advocates across the country want to meet with Alan Bersin, national commander of the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection. That meeting should happen soon if the Obama administration is serious about adopting more practical and humane policies. U.S. Rep. John Conyers, D-Detroit, is among lawmakers calling for Bersin to meet with community members.

In a new report called "A Culture of Cruelty," the Arizona-based advocacy group No More Deaths details thousands of abuses by U.S. Border Patrol agents along the U.S.-Mexican border -- many in violation of the department's own rules -- including withholding food and water from detainees, beatings and failure to provide needed medical treatment.

The report is based on interviews with nearly 13,000 people in three Mexican border towns, conducted from late 2008 until the spring of this year, immediately after illegal immigrants were deported from Arizona. Among the findings: Only 20% of people in custody for more than two days said they had received a meal, and 86% were deported without necessary medical care.

Calling for independent oversight of U.S. immigration practices and policies, the report concluded that abuses were systemic -- part of the Border Patrol's culture -- rather than the result of aberrant behavior by a few bad agents.

"There's a real lack of accountability and a general disregard for human rights by the U.S. Border Patrol," said Charlie Rooney, a Detroit-area human rights activist who also lives in Tucson, where he is active with No More Deaths.

Human rights violations are not limited to the Southwest. Racial and religious profiling, harassment, abusive interrogation, searches without probable cause, sweeps of public transit (especially on trains and buses in New York), and inadequate medical care of detainees have become common along the northern border as well.

Ryan Bates, director of the Alliance for Immigrants Rights & Reform Michigan, cited numerous recent incidents in the Detroit area, including a July 25 detention by border patrol agents on the grounds of St. Anne's Church in southwest Detroit during mass. Agents released the man after an hour.

Many residents -- legal and illegal -- live in fear of harassment. The federal government deported a record 392,000 people last year. When abuses occur -- especially when U.S. agents violate their own policies -- internal investigations should not close the books. Such cases need the scrutiny of an outside agency, such as the U.S. Department of Justice.

Moreover, reform advocates want to see border patrol agents given the same sort of training and scrutiny other police agencies undergo, including in-car cameras. They also want schools and churches off-limits to agents seeking to interrogate people. El Paso has already adopted such a policy.

A meeting between Bersin and immigration advocates won't resolve all these issues, but it could help the U.S. make sensible and informed changes in policy, while improving relations with all immigrant communities.
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, November 4, 2011

Racial Profiling Undermines Public Safety

For Immediate Release
Date: Friday, November 4, 2011
Contact: Matthew Morgan – 202-226-5543

Racial Profiling Undermines Public Safety
Targeting based on race poor substitute for good police work and Illegal

(WASHINGTON) – Today, the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security held a hearing on “21stCentury Law Enforcement: How Smart Policing Targets Criminal Behavior.”  The hearing focused on racial profiling and its supposed effectiveness as a legitimate law enforcement tactic.  The subcommittee heard testimony from the following witnesses:

·         Mr. Hilary O. Shelton, Director, NAACP Washington Bureau
·         Ms. Heather Mac Donald, Senior Fellow, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research
·         Mr. Edward Conlon, Former NYPD Detective
·         Mr. David A. Harris, Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh Law
·         Mr. Jiles H. Ship, National President, National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives

In response to their testimony at today’s hearing , House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.) made the following statement:

“Racial profiling is a poor substitute for smart policing,” said Conyers.  “The basis of effective policing is the promotion of  a positive relationship between law enforcement officials and the communities they aim to protect.  But the specter of racial profiling has contaminated the relationship between the police and minority communities to such a degree that more than 25 states have enacted legislation to address the issue of racial profiling.  If law enforcement is to do its job effectively, officers at all levels of government should be trained to focus on suspect behavior, not a person’s race, in order to better catch criminals and protect communities.    

“Since I first introduced data collection legislation in 1997, I have been engaged in an effort to get to the bottom of racial profiling issues. In response to these concerns, the Department of Justice under the past two presidents and members of Congress have introduced a variety of measures designed to sanction the practice.  Last session, I introduced the End Racial Profiling Act and plan to reintroduce that legislation later this month.  We must put in place a data collection requirement for police stops nationwide.   

“Congress must reaffirm the concept that when law-abiding citizens are treated differently by those who enforce the law simply because of their race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin, they are denied the basic respect and equal treatment that is the right of every American.”   
   
###

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Saturday, October 1, 2011

Conyers Initiates Investigation of Religious Profiling by U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency in Michigan

Contact: Nicole Triplett, 202-226-5543 

Friday, March 25, 2011 

Conyers Initiates Investigation of Religious Profiling by U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency in Michigan
(Detroit)—Today, Congressman John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.) issued the following statement regarding allegations charging the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency (CBP) with improper and inappropriate interrogations singling out American-Islamic citizens. 

“The allegations of religious profiling raised by Michigan’s Council on American-Islamic Relations in Detroit yesterday should be of concern to all Americans,” said Conyers. “CAIR has alleged that U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents have engaged in a pattern of invasive body searches and interrogations concerning the religious beliefs of American-Islamic citizens while returning home from Canada.” 

In CAIR’s letter to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, CAIR described the interrogations as follows:

The passengers hand their passports to an agent. The passengers are immediately told to turn their vehicles off. Within seconds, their vehicles are surrounded by agents brandishing weapons in their direction, whether or not there are women and children in the car. In some instances, there are snipers. The men are thrown against their vehicles, handcuffed, and taken inside for questioning. An invasive and humiliating body search is performed, which many have described as sexual harassment. Some are left handcuffed for hours on end, in many cases standing upright. Others are left in a cell. At least a dozen Muslim women of Somali origin have also reported being subjected to invasive and humiliating searches at the border that they felt were inappropriate and a form of sexual harassment.

American Muslims crossing the border have reported in alarming numbers that they are being subjected to extensive inappropriate questioning pertaining to religion and religious practices. A number of questions appear to be most common:

1. Do you pray five times a day?

2. Which mosque do you pray at?

3. Do you pray your morning prayer at the mosque?

4. Who is the Imam (religious leader) at your mosque?

5. Who else prays at your mosque?

6. Which Muslim charities have you donated to?

7. Which Muslim countries have you traveled to?

8. During your travels to these countries, have you been approached by anyone suspicious?

9. What do you think of Anwar al-Awlacki?

10. Which Muslim organizations are you affiliated with?

11. Are you affiliated with any terrorist organizations?

12. Do you know any terrorists?

13. Are there terrorists in your mosques?

All in all, the process can take anywhere between two to ten hours. More disconcerting is that these same individuals report being subjected to the same mistreatment and inappropriate questioning each and every time they cross the border. 

“With federal hearings on radicalization and intense scrutiny by law enforcement of religious institutions, the American-Islamic community today is living in a climate that has the risk of producing a siege mentality,” said Conyers. “I am therefore contacting the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security to initiate an investigation of these allegations, and I will be consulting Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas).”

“The American-Islamic community should know that the federal government will protect the interests of the community, while maintaining the appropriate focus on national security. These allegations of racial and religious profiling at the border are not new and have been supported by previous studies of the Government Accountability Office. For example, in 2000, the GAO found that the U.S. Customs’ patterns used to select airline passengers for more intrusive searches resulted in women and minorities being selected at rates that were not consistent with the rates of finding contraband.”

###