Thursday, February 18, 2016

Senior House Judiciary Committee Democrats Express Concern Over Government Attempts to Undermine Encryption


Washington, D.C.—Earlier this week, through a court order, the United States government demanded that Apple Inc. help the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) develop software in an effort to break the encryption on an iPhone that was recovered after the recent shootings in San Bernardino, California.  The government cited the “All Writs Act,” enacted in 1789, to demand that the technology company create a new version of the iPhone operating system to circumvent several security features on the device.  Apple has five days to respond to the court’s order.  The House Judiciary Committee will hold an oversight hearing on the encryption debate on March 1.

Dean of the U.S. House
of Representatives
John Conyers, Jr.
Senior Democratic Members of the House Judiciary Committee, Reps. Conyers, Nadler, Lofgren and Jackson Lee, released the following statement in response:

“The terrorist attack in San Bernardino was a tragic event.  We agree that heightened vigilance is necessary to combat the threat of home grown extremism in all of its forms.  In this effort, we commit our full support to law enforcement agencies at the local, state, and federal levels and hope to provide them with the resources and tools they require to perform their jobs. 

“But there is little reason for the government to make this demand on Apple—except to enact a policy proposal that has gained no traction in Congress and was rejected by the White House.

“Properly understood, strong encryption is our best defense against online criminals—including terrorist organizations.  It is the backbone of the Internet economy and vital for the protection of both free expression and privacy.  The government’s demand on Apple would coerce a private U.S. company to hack its own device, threatening the trust of millions of customers and placing our technology industry at a significant disadvantage abroad. 

“In a September 2015 article, the Washington Post  cited an email from a top intelligence community official which stated: ‘the legislative environment is very hostile today . . . it could turn in the event of a terrorist attack or criminal event where strong encryption can be shown to have hindered law enforcement.’  We are concerned that the heartbreaking event in San Bernardino is being exploited to undertake an end-run around the legislative process in just this fashion.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Flint Is the Predicted Outcome of Michigan’s Long, Dangerous History With ‘Emergency Managers’

By John Conyers, Jr.

Dean of the U.S. House
of Representatives
John Conyers, Jr.
For years, I have joined voters, other elected officials, and even courts in warning that the right-wing takeover of local government would end this way.

The immediate causes of the water-contamination crisis in Flint and the hazardous conditions of Detroit’s public schools are by now common knowledge: the poor, shortsighted decisions made by the emergency managers appointed by Michigan’s Republican governor, Rick Snyder. Far less known are the numerous warning signs of the dangers posed by these unaccountable EMs to the people of Michigan—signs that Governor Snyder chose to ignore. The resulting tragedies were thus not only foreseeable, but entirely preventable.

Enacted in 1988, Michigan’s original financial-distress law—which simply authorized the state to involve itself in the affairs of local governments facing a “financial emergency”—was rarely used. Then, in 2005, the right-wing think tank Mackinac Center for Public Policy advocated that law be broadened to grant EMs the power to take over all aspects of local government, including the power to unilaterally reject collective-bargaining agreements, and to insulate EMs from any resulting legal liability. By 2011, Snyder had been elected governor, and Republicans had taken control of both the State Senate and House. One of their first orders of business was to dramatically expand the law along the lines proposed by the Mackinac Center. The EM law soon came to be seen as a vehicle for corporate privatization, with a 2011 New York Times investigation revealing that EM training sessions were “run primarily by representatives from companies who stand to benefit financially.”

As EM appointments increased sharply due to state-imposed cutbacks in local revenue-sharing as well as the impact of the Great Recession, numerous red flags were raised. The Michigan Department of Treasury’s own internal analysis highlighted the law’s overreach, concluding: “This bill allows emergency managers too much power and control over local units of government. Emergency managers can’t be trusted to act in the interests of the local unit and will use the enhanced powers granted under this bill for their own gain.” Professor Kenneth Klee, one of the nation’s preeminent experts on bankruptcy, wrote that the law “is violative of [the US Constitution’s] Contracts Clause…. No prior legislature has had the audacity to legislate the unilateral termination, rejection, or modification of a collective bargaining agreement.” Voting-rights expert Jocelyn Benson, the current dean of Wayne State Law School, found that “there is significant evidence [that the] amended Emergency Financial Manager law has disproportionate impact on the state’s Black and Latino population.”

The appointment of EMs with the power to usurp local elected officials proved to have a significant negative impact on minority communities and their votes, with more than half of the state’s black voters subject to governance by EMs since 2009. Emergency managers have run cities with large African-American populations, such as Highland Park (94 percent), Benton Harbor (89 percent), Detroit (83 percent), Flint (56 percent), Pontiac (52 percent), and Ecorse (46 percent). Benton Harbor, which has been operating under an EM since 2010, saw its voter-participation rate decline by more than half.

Organized labor, civil-rights groups, and others challenging the law’s unprecedented scope initiated a series of lawsuits. The Ingham County Circuit Court found the law’s implementation to be in contravention of the Open Meetings Act. In 2010, a Wayne County court found the Detroit Public Schools EM had exceeded his mandate by attempting to make academic reforms, which at that time were within the elected school board’s sole discretion.

Numerous instances of abuse, conflict of interest, and mismanagement by EMs came to light. In Pontiac, EMs incurred a potential loss of $1.4 million in US Department of Housing and Urban Development funding due to mismanagement of grants. EM Michael Stampfler outsourced the city’s wastewater treatment to United Water shortly after the firm faced a 26-count indictment in Indiana for violating the Clean Water Act. In Highland Park, the EM had previously been terminated for making more than $200,000 in unauthorized payments to himself.

The sad part is that there are more sensible alternatives than the top-down approach to which Governor Snyder clings.

In Benton Harbor, an independent audit found that the EM had exceeded the budget by more than $650,000, had inadequate controls over its financial reporting, and had failed to make required contributions to pension plans. Senator Gary Peters and I called for a Government Accountability Office investigation, which found in 2015 that under the Flint EM, workforce cuts had reduced the city’s ability to obtain critical federal grants and led to federal funds being withheld from the city as a result of its failure to address grant-monitoring deficiencies.

* * *

None of this went unnoticed by elected officials and voters. Along with two other members of Congress, 55 state legislators, and eight members of the Detroit City Council, I wrote a letter in December 2011 expressing concerns regarding the legislation’s implementation. Similar letters were issued by both of Michigan’s senators and two additional congressional representatives. In March 2012, we again wrote the governor seeking evidence that he was properly overseeing his emergency managers.

But voters themselves delivered perhaps the most significant warning sign. When a petition drive was initiated to allow Michigan voters to decide whether to retain the emergency-manager law, Republicans sought to thwart the effort with a series of legal and legislative maneuvers. Those attempts ultimately failed, and in November 2012, 52 percent of Michigan voters opted to repeal the controversial law outright.

Governor Snyder and the Republicans in Lansing responded to all of these warning signs by doubling down on the flawed law. Instead of listening to the voters and their elected representatives, independent experts, and watchdogs, they passed a substitute bill during a hastily called lame-duck session that retained many of its predecessor’s deficiencies. Even worse, the legislature added an appropriations rider, thereby preventing the citizens of Michigan from being able to overturn the new law. The same failed EMs that had been in place earlier returned to work or were recycled to other jurisdictions. For example, Darnell Earley, who presided over the Flint water debacle, was later appointed to run the Detroit public-school system, where he ignored health hazards that endanger our teachers, students, and parents.

The sad part is that there are more sensible alternatives than the heavy-handed, top-down approach to which Governor Snyder clings. There are numerous cases in which more effective legal alternatives have been used to restore fiscal stability while remaining true to the principles of representative government through the use of financial-control boards and similar supportive fiscal devices. Such methods have been used in New York City (1975), Cleveland (1978), Philadelphia (1991), Bridgeport, Connecticut (1991), the District of Columbia (1995), and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania (2011), among other cities.

But after we’ve seen cities starved of desperately needed revenues; and citizens denied the right to elect their own leaders; and short-sighted, mindless budget cuts and privatization schemes; and failed EMs recycled into new jobs; and a steady drumbeat of warnings—from the courts, elected officials, independent watchdogs, and the voters themselves—ignored, the real question isn’t how the disasters in Flint and the Detroit public schools could have happened, but how many other state-made catastrophes are looming.

We can’t undo the damage already done by the lead-poisoned water in Flint, or fix the harm already caused by the deplorable conditions in Detroit’s public schools. But we can make sure that the unaccountable emergency managers responsible for these debacles—and the legal system that empowered them—are not permitted to inflict further harm on our citizens.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Friday, February 12, 2016

House Judiciary Committee Democrats Request Hearing on the Role of Emergency Managers in Flint and Detroit, Michigan


Chairman of the U.S. House Judiciary Democratic Committee, John Conyers, Jr.
WASHINGTON – Today, all sixteen Democratic Members of the U.S. House Committee on the 
Judiciary issued a letter to Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) requesting a hearing to examine the role of Emergency Financial Managers (EFM) in financially distressed cities in Michigan.

In the letter, the Members request that the Committee “conduct hearings concerning the operation of the Michigan Emergency Manager Law and its role in the tragedies concerning the poisoning of Flint’s water and the dangerous deterioration of the Detroit Public Schools.”

The lawmakers also wrote, “the Committee on the Judiciary has a long history of holding hearings on matters of grave legal and constitutional significance. Given the tragic consequences of Michigan’s emergency manager law for the citizens of Flint and Detroit, and the legal and constitutional questions such laws raise, we believe it is not only appropriate but necessary for the Committee to review these issues.”

The letter was signed by Ranking Member John Conyers, Jr. (MI-13), Reps. Sheila Jackson Lee (TX-18), Jerrold Nadler (NY-10), Zoe Lofgren (CA-19), Steven Cohen (TN-09), Hank Johnson (GA-04), Pedro Pierluisi (PR-Res. Comms.), Judy Chu (CA-27), Ted Deutch (FL-21),  Luis Gutierrez (IL-04), Karen Bass (CA-27), Cedric Richmond (LA-02), Suzan DelBene (WA-01), David Cicilline (RI-01), Hakeem Jeffries (NY-08), and Scott Peters (CA-52).
Background:

Enacted in 1988, the original Michigan financial distress law was rarely used and simply authorized the State to involve itself in the affairs of local government facing a “financial emergency.”

Many state budgets were tightened after the 2008 Great Recession.   By 2010, when Rick Snyder was elected Governor and Republicans took control of both the State House and Senate, one of their first orders of business was to dramatically expand the Emergency Manager law to grant Emergency Managers the power to take over all aspects of local governments, to unilaterally reject collective bargaining agreements, and to insulate Emergency Managers from legal liability.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Thursday, February 11, 2016

Statement of the Honorable John Conyers, Jr., Ranking Member, Hearing on “Is the Investor Visa Program an Underperforming Asset?”


Dean of the U.S House
of Representatives
John Conyers, Jr.
“Today’s hearing focuses on the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program. When Congress established the program in 1990, the intention was to create jobs for American citizens and to bring new investment capital to the United States.

“I believe that the EB-5 Program can have a positive impact on distressed urban and rural communities by providing a source of jobs and investment. However, there are fundamental questions about how the Program is currently being used and whether adequate integrity safeguards exist. 

“To begin with, the current practices used to draw Targeted Employment Areas must be reformed.

“To help incentivize investment and job creation in rural or high unemployment areas, the EB-5 Program offered a reduced investment level of $500,000 for projects in designated Targeted Employment Areas (TEAs).

“However, as reported by The Wall Street Journal, as well as many other news sources, the vast majority of EB-5 investment funds are going to projects in some of America’s most affluent areas that qualify as TEAs only because of gerrymandering.

“By stringing census tracts together from high unemployment neighborhoods to wealthy ones, project developers have been able to take advantage of the lower Targeted Employment Area investment level while still investing in projects in more desirable and affluent areas.

“This practice has been strongly criticized by the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights.  It notes that ‘the EB-5 Regional Center Program has dramatically deviated from its original purpose – to spur job creation and development in rural and high unemployment areas.’

 “Steering investments to projects in our cities’ wealthiest neighborhoods – at the expense of the urban and rural communities that need it most – is not what Congress intended when it established Targeted Employment Areas and the lower investment level.

“The Congressional District that I represent, for instance, suffers from an unemployment rate of more than 300% the national average.  I am pleased to say that today we are starting to come back.  But for those Americans living in urban poverty, in my city of Detroit, and in many other cities across the country, manipulation of Targeted Employment Areas has diverted a potential source of jobs and neighborhood improvement away from those it was intended to help.

 “As the Leadership Conference points out, it is not enough to have development in more affluent areas where low- income workers might commute to because the projects will still leave ‘these communities of concentrated poverty no better off in terms of development and infrastructure after their conclusion.’

“Secondly, the EB-5 program suffers from the absence of good data on projects and jobs created.

“In order to receive a green card, a foreign investor must prove that the investment will create at least 10 jobs for U.S. workers.  Under the Regional Center program, investors can account for the 10 jobs by counting direct, indirect, and induced jobs.  These indirect and induced jobs are calculated by econometric models.

“While some data exist on the more than $13 billion of foreign direct investment since 2008, there is very little hard information on actual jobs created by EB-5 Regional Centers.  We don’t know whether these are jobs that pay a living wage, whether they offer long-term employment, and whether they have benefitted workers from distressed communities.
   
“The AFL-CIO shares these concerns and states that increased data will ‘shed light on whether the program is meeting its mandates - to spur growth and create jobs in underserved areas.’   

“Finally, I remain committed to working with Chairman Goodlatte and others to improve the EB-5 Program.

“The reforms that Chairman Goodlatte, Senate Judiciary Chairman Grassley, Senate Judiciary Ranking Member Leahy, and I negotiated last year demonstrate that meaningful bicameral, bipartisan reform is possible.

“Our sensible and widely supported proposal addressed the integrity concerns that we will be discussing today.  It raised the minimum investment levels for the first time since the program was created in 1990, and included provisions to protect investors from unscrupulous actors. 

“Most importantly, our proposal would have helped to reign in current abuses of the EB-5 investor visa program so that increased investment would be directed to the distressed urban and rural communities that need it most.
   
“I remain confident that we can accomplish these important legislative reforms this Congress and I look forward to continuing to work with Chairman Goodlatte on this effort.

“I thank the witnesses for their participation today and I yield back the balance of my time.”

Click here to read all testimonies by today’s witnesses.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

House Judiciary Committee Approves Bipartisan Prison Reform Legislation


Bill is part of the House Judiciary Committee’s criminal justice reform initiative

Washington, D.C.  – The House Judiciary Committee today approved by voice vote the Corrections and Recidivism Reduction Act (H.R. 759) to reform the federal prison system, strengthen public safety, enhance prison security, provide inmates the help they need, and protect civil liberties. This legislation is one of many bills that have been approved by the House Judiciary Committee as part of its bipartisan criminal justice reform initiative.

At the markup, the Committee adopted a bipartisan amendment in the nature of a substitute that was offered by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), Ranking Member John Conyers (D-Mich.), Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations Subcommittee Ranking Member Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas), Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations Subcommittee Chairman Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), Representative Cedric Richmond (D-La.), Representative Doug Collins (R-Ga.), Representative Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.),  Representative Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), and Representative Karen Bass (D-Calif.).

Below are statements from the authors of the legislation praising today’s Committee approval of the bill.

Dean of the U.S. House
of Representatives
John Conyers, Jr.
Ranking Member Conyers: “I am pleased that the Committee has continued its work on criminal justice reform legislation by approving a bipartisan bill to reform our federal prisons. This bill will provide a meaningful opportunity to many offenders to reduce their time in prison through successful participation in various programs that will reduce their risk of recidivism. For too long, our prisons have simply warehoused individuals whom we know will eventually return to society and, for their benefit and ours, it simply makes sense that we provide incentives for prisoners to be better prepared to re-enter and be productive members of their communities. Adoption of this bill by the Committee is a good first step toward making our federal prison system more humane, more effective, and less costly.  I look forward to House consideration of this and other criminal justice reform bills.”

Chairman Goodlatte: “Today the House Judiciary Committee approved another important component of its bipartisan criminal justice reform initiative. The Corrections and Recidivism Reduction Act makes meaningful reforms to the prison system that strengthen the safety of our communities and provide inmates the help that they need while in prison to help them better reenter society upon their release. I thank the many members that have worked on this bill and look forward to continue working on other issues facing the criminal justice system.”

Rep. Chaffetz: “It is not enough to be tough on crime. We have to be smart on crime. More than 95 percent of people that go to prison will be released. Our collective goal should be to lower the recidivism rates and prepare inmates to integrate back into our communities. We all benefit if inmates gain marketable skills rather than criminal insights during their sentence. This legislation will facilitate integration while saving taxpayers money.”

Crime Subcommittee Ranking Member Jackson Lee: “Recidivism is a multi-tiered problem with no easy answer. The legislation passed by the committee today is an excellent first step in the direction to helping former inmates. The bill reflects many of the provisions that I fought for including parenting skills and re-entry plans to name a few. Many factors go into a former inmate’s decision to re-offend after release. It is important to note, however, that there have been many studies showing prison programs systems which provide institutional programming have lower recidivism rates among those who are released. Prison programs such as anger management, vocational skills training, educational opportunities, and even trauma support groups are vital to ensuring inmates who are reintroduced to the general population have the life skills necessary to stay on the right path. I look forward to this bill passing the House and going to the President’s desk for his signature.”

Crime Subcommittee Chairman Sensenbrenner: “The Corrections and Recidivism Reduction Act is an important component of our broad criminal justice reform efforts. Ensuring prisoners make a smooth transition from incarceration back into the population is imperative for strong families, strong communities, and long-term success. This bill will reduce the amount of taxpayer money spent on our broken federal prison system, make neighborhoods safer, and provide individuals with the tools they need to stay out of prison and be productive members of society.”

Rep. Richmond: “Being serious about reducing the prison population starts with making the necessary investment to rehabilitate and prepare inmates to lead productive lives once they return home. Increasing access to proven recidivism risk reduction programs will equip them with life skills that help keep ex-offenders from falling back into the same bad choices that landed them in prison in the first place. I’m proud to join my colleagues in getting the federal government out of the business of warehousing inmates and into the business of reforming and rehabilitating people.”

Rep. Collins: “Reducing the likelihood of recidivism through these reforms will be a step toward ending the vicious cycle in which so many former inmates find themselves trapped. The transforming power of a second chance is something I have seen during my time in the ministry. Giving qualified, low-risk offenders increased access to rehabilitative programs during and after their sentences will ultimately help lead them to live productive lives outside prison and increase public safety. This legislation also includes a provision that I co-authored to protect the fundamental right of attorney-client privilege by ensuring that electronic communications are treated the same way as other forms of privileged communication between an inmate and their legal representative. I believe all Americans have a right to legal representation, and interfering with that would be a violation of their Constitutional rights. These common sense reforms will save taxpayers money, while making our criminal justice system more effective.”

Rep. Jeffries: “We have a badly broken criminal justice system in America that has decimated countless families and wasted millions of taxpayer dollars. This bill is a significant first step in the right direction with respect to encouraging rehabilitation, promoting successful re-entry and improving the efficient administration of government funding. The country will be a better place when this legislation is enacted into law.”

Rep. Gowdy: “H.R. 759 is an important step toward creating a smarter and more effective federal prison system. It incentivizes individuals to take steps to reduce their risk of ending up back in federal prison while implementing new policies to enhance public safety and prison security. It also protects inmates’ civil liberties by respecting attorney-client privilege in electronic communications. I thank my colleagues for their hard work on this bipartisan legislation and look forward to continuing to work with them to improve our federal prison system.”

Rep. Bass: “Restraining pregnant inmates, especially when they are giving birth, is barbaric. It is ludicrous to think that a woman prisoner giving birth would be at risk of escaping. I am glad that the final bill contains language that I authored that will prevent women prisoners from being restrained unnecessarily while they are pregnant or giving birth. Several states have already outlawed this practice, and the federal government should as well.”

Key Components of Corrections and Recidivism Reduction Act:

Strengthens Public Safety:
·         The Corrections and Recidivism Reduction Act implements a post-sentencing dynamic risk assessment system to determine an inmate’s risk of committing more crimes upon release from prison. Under the legislation, the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) would utilize effective recidivism reduction programs and provide incentives for inmates to participate in those programs. Ultimately, inmates could earn credits toward an alternative custody arrangement – such as a halfway house or home confinement – at the end of their prison sentence. 
·         Renders criminals convicted of certain serious offenses ineligible for the alternative custody program, including dangerous sexual offenders, murderers, and others.

Enhances Prison Security:
·         The bill authorizes the Director of BOP to issue pepper spray to those employed in a prison above the medium security level.
·         The bill requires the Director of BOP to provide a secure storage area outside the secure perimeter for employees to store firearms or to allow for vehicle lock boxes for firearms.
·         The bill requires the Director of BOP to provide de-escalation training as part of the regular training requirements of correctional officers.

Provide Inmates the Help They Need:
·         The bill requires BOP to initiate pilot programs for youth mentorship and the training and therapy of rescue dogs.
·         It requires BOP to submit a report and evaluation of the current pilot program to treat heroin and opioid abuse through medication assisted treatment.
·         The bill extends the compassionate elderly release provision from the Second Chance Act that allows the prisoner to request for his or her compassionate release if he or she meets the requirements set out in the law.
·         The bill codifies BOP’s rules on using restraints on pregnant inmates, which generally prohibit the use of restraints on pregnant inmates except those who are an immediate and credible flight risk or threat of harm to herself, the baby, or others.

Protects Civil Liberties:
·         The bill prevents BOP from monitoring the contents of electronic communications to or from a prisoner in a federal prison facility and his attorney or other legal representative. The bill contains an exception when BOP obtains a court order to monitor electronic communications for the purpose of entering it into evidence, or use or disclose, the contents of the communications.

Learn more about the House Judiciary Committee’s criminal justice reform initiative here.

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Statement of Ranking Member John Conyers, Jr. Markup of H.R. 759, the “Recidivism Risk Reduction Act,”


Dean of the U.S. House
of Representatives
John Conyers, Jr.
 “I commend the Chairman for bringing H.R. 759 before the Committee today.  It is critical, as part of the Committee’s efforts to reform our criminal justice system, that we take action to improve our federal prisons, and I am pleased that today we will consider a bipartisan, substitute amendment to this bill which will establish  a better way of operating our prisons."

“The massive growth of our prison population is a crisis in both human and fiscal terms.  Over the past four decades, the U.S. prison population has skyrocketed. "

“Since the early 1970s, the U.S. prison population has grown from 200,000 to over 2 million persons.  Since 1980, the rate of imprisonment at the federal level has grown by more than 500 percent.  As a result, during that period annual federal spending on prisons increased from 970 million dollars to more than 6.5 billion in inflation-adjusted dollars."

“The Department of Justice’s expenditures on prisons now constitute more than 20 percent of its total outlays.   This is unsustainable. "

“While imprisonment is appropriate and necessary for some offenders, we must address this crisis by making fundamental changes to the federal system. "

“The first and essential step is reforming our sentencing laws to ensure that sentences are not inappropriately and counterproductively long, and this Committee last year approved a bipartisan bill that is a good first step toward doing so. "

“Now, by taking up legislation concerning prison reform, we are taking another important step toward changing our approach to incarceration. "

“For too long, our prisons have simply warehoused individuals whom we know will eventually return to society.  For their benefit and ours, we must adopt a more constructive approach."

“That is why I support establishing a system in federal prisons that will encourage prisoners to participate in programs that will improve their lives, both inside and outside prison, and that will reduce their risk of committing additional offenses when they are released. "

“That is the goal of this legislation.  It simply makes sense that we provide incentives for prisoners to be better prepared to re-enter and be productive members of their communities. "

“I look forward to the discussion and adoption of the substitute amendment which will greatly improve the underlying bill and which will constitute a good first step toward making our federal prison system more humane, more effective and less costly.”

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

CONYERS, Scott and Lawrence on Unsafe Learning, Working Environment in Detroit Schools


Washington, D.C. – Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI), Ranking Member of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA), Ranking Member of the U.S. House Education and the Workforce Committee and Rep. Brenda Lawrence (D-MI) today released the following statements after teachers at several Detroit Public Schools (DPS) reported dangerous working and learning conditions:
Dean of the U.S. House
of Representatives
John Conyers, Jr.
Rep. John Conyers: “After what we have witnessed in Flint, Michiganders are rapidly losing whatever trust they had in their state government to protect them. We need transparency and a commitment to dialogue between the public and their elected—and appointed—officials in order to solve the problems we are facing. Against this backdrop, the apparent decision of the DPS emergency management team to block Detroit Federation of Teachers’ health inspectors—with threats of arrest no less—is a grave mistake.  Our educators and our children are subjected to learning in schools that are unsafe, unsanitary and unacceptable It is reprehensible to turn away free resources meant to help us solve these problems.  While Detroit Emergency Manager (EM) Earley, formerly Flint’s EM, made an abrupt decision to step down from his position last week, it appears he has not finished stonewalling those who want to get to the bottom of questions about public health and safety.  While the DPS emergency management team may—or may not—be within their authority to block these inspections, it is clearly wrong to prevent us from learning more about the deplorable conditions of our schools and how we can remedy them sooner, instead of continuing the gridlock.”
Rep. Bobby Scott: “Rat infestations, black mold, leaking roofs, and excessive heat and cold are not conditions conducive to teaching and learning in Detroit or anywhere else in our country. All students and school employees deserve a safe environment in which to learn and to work. Any health hazard that jeopardizes learning and working conditions is unacceptable. I look forward to working with my colleagues to support efforts that would ensure a long term sustainable solution to remediating the infrastructure issues in Detroit to ensure that we live up to the decision in Brown v. Board of Education and provide the students of Detroit and across the country an education that is ‘a right which must be made available to all on equal terms.”
Rep. Brenda Lawrence: “As someone who was born and raised in Detroit and educated in the Detroit Public School system, and as a former School Board President, I am horrified by the deplorable conditions our teachers and students have been subjected to. If we are to correct these conditions we cannot put up roadblocks to health inspectors who are trying to make sure our children are in a safe environment. This is about our investment in our children, in their education, and in their future. We must do whatever we can to ensure not one more child is exposed to these hazardous conditions.”
Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©