Showing posts with label detention. Show all posts
Showing posts with label detention. Show all posts

Saturday, October 1, 2011

Detroit to get first U.S. patent satellite office

Detroit to get first U.S. patent satellite office


The first satellite office of the United States Patent and Trademark Office is set to open in Detroit in early spring 2011, opening up jobs for 100 patent examiners plus support staff.
U.S. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke made the announcement today in a conference call. He was joined by Gov. Jennifer Granholm and David Kappos, Commerce’s undersecretary for intellectual property and director of the patent office.
The office will monitor the results of the Detroit office in preparation for more regional offices around the country.
“Perhaps two more will open within a year after Detroit,” Locke said.
The decision on the location has not been made, Kappos said. The Patent Office is planning to sign an occupancy agreement this month, with a lease to follow in February. Job offers would start going out soon after that in preparation for an early spring or possibly late winter opening, he said.
The new office and the hiring of 100 examiners will give patent applicants more time to meet for examiner interviews and in turn speed up the patent approval process.
The Patent Office currently has about 710,000 patent applications in its backlog, Kappos said. That’s down from 750,000 at the beginning of the year, amid an increased number of applications, but that’s still not close to being good enough, Locke said.
The goal is to reduce average patent waiting times from three years to one.
Calling the three-year wait time “unacceptable,” Locke compared it to asking a bank for a loan to expand a factory that the applicant won’t have the title to for another three years.
Locke first mentioned the possibility of Detroit getting a patent office in October during a visit to the Detroit Regional Chamber.
The move to set up regional patent offices is also intended to improve recruitment and retention of the patent examiners, who decide which applications get approved. Recruitment is challenging because examiners must possess advanced technical knowledge, a quality that makes them employable elsewhere.
Setting up regional offices will allow the main patent office to no longer ask qualified candidates to move to the Washington, D.C., area.
It also would give the office access to pockets of specialized skilled workers. That’s where Detroit comes in. The region’s abundance of advanced — and unemployed — engineers makes it a perfect fit for the pilot satellite office, Locke, Kappos and Granholm all said.
The Department of Commerce also chose Michigan to set up its first CommerceConnect office. The one-stop access point to all of the department's services for businesses opened in October 2009, and more offices are planned in other regions of the country.
The Pontiac office was a factor in choosing the Detroit area, as was low building costs, access to local research universities and a high number of patent applications coming out of Michigan.
“This city fulfills a number of critical criteria,” Kappos said.
Granholm said the University of Michigan “pushed to have this office come here.”
The presence of schools such as UM and Wayne State University brings diversity to the local technology, said James Stevens, president of the Michigan Intellectual Property Law Association and managing shareholder at Reising Ethington P.C. in Troy.
“Any area has a flavor to its technology,” Stevens said.
He said the hiring of 100 examiners is a serious number. Unlike in past downturns when automotive engineers tended to be untouched, the recent recession has brought layoffs to their doorsteps, as well, he said.
“A lot of them are still in town looking for work,” Stevens said.

Conyers: Limited Government Party Turns Out to Be a Party of the Unlimited





Conyers:  Limited Government Party Turns Out to Be a Party of the Unlimited
New Bill Authorizes Prolonged and Indefinite Detention With No Respect for the Rule of Law

(Washington) – Today, at a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee on H.R. 1932, Ranking Member John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.) criticized the bill as a massive, unconstitutional expansion of the government’s ability to detain immigrants for many years—even indefinitely—with little or no procedural protections at all.

“It is ironic that this bill comes from the Judiciary Committee leadership that should be protecting the Constitution and from the party that prides itself on limited government and the protection of individual liberty,” Conyers said.  “The Republican Party’s Pledge to America was all about ensuring limited government and fiscal responsibility.  Tea Party Patriots lists ‘Constitutionally Limited Government’ as a core value.  AndTeaParty.Org says its ‘non-negotiable core beliefs’ include: ‘Intrusive Government Stopped’ and ‘Government Must Be Downsized.’

“Under this bill, thousands of immigration detainees would become subject to mandatory detention—with no opportunity for a bond hearing—even if they pose no risk to the public and no risk of flight. 

“Ten years after the Supreme Court cautioned that the Constitution would permit extended detention of immigration detainees only in very narrow circumstances accompanied by strong procedural protections, H.R. 1932 allows immigration detainees to be held indefinitely simply by the stroke of the pen of the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

“The writ of habeas corpus is a fundamental guarantee of the Constitution.  If H.R. 1932 becomes law, all habeas corpus petitions challenging the legality of mandatory, prolonged, and indefinite immigration detention would have to be filed in the District Court of the District of Columbia.  The only possible explanation for doing that would be to make it harder for a person who may not speak English, almost always has no lawyer, and is being detained in Arizona or Texas to get into court.

“We need to make sure that our detention and removal system works, so that we are holding the right people, under the right conditions, and for the right reasons.  And that we remove people from this country when they have gone through the process and received a final decision in their case.  But this bill will not advance any of those goals.  Instead, it will just increase our already enormous and expensive detention system and will remove or limit the few meaningful checks that still exist.”